Wednesday June 23, 2004 at 3:46 PM
Reagan: A Turn for the Worse
Appearing in Truth & Justice

Although I’m a bit behind the curve on this one, with the body of former president Ronald Reagan now entombed in a quiet hillside in Simi Valley and flags still flying at half-mast, it seems a relevant but respectful distance from which to reflect on the legacy of the man Republicans hold forth as the King of All Things Conservative.
In the days immediately following his death, supporters of Reagan were quick to credit him with everything from the fall of Communism to the economic boom of the nineties. Historians, colleagues, politicians and friends all paraded across our televisions reflecting on his optimism and essential goodness. Reagan they said, was a “good man”.
Somehow though, such characterization don’t quite square with the policies and actions of a man who directly and indirectly contributed to the death of hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of people. As represented by his complete ignorance of AIDS, his apathy towards the world’s poor, his indifference to the economic plight of the nation’s working class, or his belligerent military operations around the globe, Reagan’s policies hardly stand as the great symbol of moral action or compassionate behavior that many self-righteous Conservatives would have us believe.
Rather, Reagan’s policies, attitudes, and philosophy clearly point to a man that valued Capitalism over Democracy, economics over people. When he declared that “Government isn’t the solution. Government is the problem.” Reagan announced to us all that he believed that the institution of government, and the principles of democracy and equality on which it rested, was fundamentally incapable of serving our needs. And in its place, he put forth Capitalism as the guiding institution of our society.
In describing the Cold War in zero-sum terms — “It’s simple. We win, they lose.” — he left as ambiguous the “we” and the “them”. Perhaps he meant it politically, Democracy versus totalitarianism, but it’s just as likely that he meant it economically, Capitalism versus Communism.
While supporters will continue to claim that Reagan’s lasting legacy was the fall of Communism — it would have fallen anyway — and opponents will continue to highlight the failings of his economic and social policies — many of which were later reversed or repaired by subsequent Administrations — Reagan’s true legacy, the one that still haunts us today, is the degree to which he moved the country away from the values of Democracy and towards the values of Capitalism.
By the end of the Reagan Presidency vast numbers of people had come to believe that not only was government the problem but that free-market Capitalism was the solution. And that shift in attitude directly led to a nation where open debate, productive compromise, and equal opportunity has been replaced by the brutality of markets, the insecurity of workers, and the spiritual vacuum of consumerism.
Certainly no friend of civil rights, the working poor, or the environment, Reagan’s much celebrated optimism was emblematic of his belief that he would always win personally and that we would always win as a nation. His was the optimism of a competitor and as such, stands in stark contrast to that of humanitarians like Martin Luther King, Gandhi, or even Ray Charles.
Through his policies, attitudes, and actions, Reagan demonstrated his belief in the benevolence of markets and the forces of Capitalism. Forces that are as often as not, in direct opposition to the underpinnings of Democracy including a faith in the fundamental goodness of man and respect for the connectedness of the planet.
Whether you see him as a cause or an effect, the unquestioning faith in the power of Capitalism that took root during the Reagan Presidency has not only left us with a society increasingly driven by consumerism and greed but also a citizenry largely disenfranchised from its government.
Ronald Reagan represents many things to many people. But to me, he will always stand as an unfortunate turning point in the values and virtues of Our Great Democracy.

Comments
Excellent point! Frankly I have never seen it from that perspective and therefore I thank you.
BTW its Gandhi.
Posted by: Sunny on Wed Jun 23, 04
Well said
Posted by: beerzie boy on Wed Jun 23, 04
Right on! My husband and I were on vacation when Reagan died and listened to innumerable commentaries on his legacy during our many hours in the car. Chris protested from the beginning about the inaccuracy of opposing democracy to communism...a political system vs. an economic one. It's pretty symptomatic that few people even recognize that distinction, since thanks in part to folks like Reagan it's now habitual to conflate democracy and capitalism.
Posted by: ang on Wed Jun 23, 04
As I grew up with Reagan I know little difference but I assume what took place in the 80's has had a large influence on the Presidential campaign process which is mostly dictated by the number of television ads purchased.
I still stand by my appreciation for President Reagan, but I'm glad a few people have come out to help people remember more of the history.
Posted by: Greg on Wed Jun 23, 04
Sunny...thanks for your support and for bringing the mistake to my attention. I've corrected the error and will follow up with my staff to make sure it doesn't happen again *^)
Posted by: Bob on Wed Jun 23, 04
Bob,
A friend of mine up in Alaska likes to point out that we've got Dick, Colin, and Bush running the country. Frankly, I think it will take two Johns to deal with all their mess.
Lots of people liked Reagan just because he seemed like their grandfather. Many were oblivious to his Central American atrocities (how many nuns were killed in el Salvador? 22?) or the fact that he actually thought he could re-call ICBMs after they were launched. and as for Iran-Contra, I watched his TV address and knew he was lying through his teeth when he said he knew nothing - just as I never believed "W" on his WMD claim (hell, his own CIA didn't support his position).
The American public needs to wise up. Don't buy into marketing spind (e.g. No Child Left Behind). Look into what is really happening. What is the real cost and the real result? Just because the Republicans come up with a cute phrase doesn't make it true.
On the subject of marketing spin, the Dems should start calling themselves the "Party of the Constitution" of "Party of the Bill of Rights" to get the point across at how much Ashcroft and Bush have eroded our 1st (and other) Amendment rights.
BTW, I used to be a registered Republican - no more. I've also paid over $100K a year in taxes. Paying our fare share of taxes (even a bit more) is a civic duty surpassed only by voting.
Posted by: Rich Stromberg on Wed Jun 23, 04